Welles’ Martians in ‘The War of the Worlds’ not so scary 75 years later
By Minerva Hernandez-Garcia
News
coverage of Orson Welles’ live radio drama, “The War of the Worlds,” based on
the H.G. Wells 1898 novel by the same name, was immediate and spanned the U.S.,
coast to coast. Accounts of the event appeared on the front pages of newspapers
from Los Angeles to New York, with headlines emphasizing the ensuing panic
following the fictitious news-style broadcast. Another common thread covered by
the media was the Federal Communications Commission’s involvement after the
panic subsided and radio listeners demanded the FCC adopt proper guidelines to
avoid another bout of mass hysteria.
In
the Oct. 31, 1928, issue of The New York Times, the headline was “Radio
Listeners in Panic, Taking War Drama as Fact,” followed by the subhead, “Many
Flee Homes to Escape 'Gas Raid From Mars'--Phone Calls Swamp Police at
Broadcast of Wells Fantasy.” The article is a perfect example of the immediate
coverage seen after the broadcast. It details the actual drama in the lead: “A
wave of mass hysteria seized thousands of radio listeners throughout the nation
between 8:15 and 9:30 o’clock last night when a broadcast of a dramatization of
H.G. Wells’ fantasy, “The War of the Worlds,” led thousands to believe that an interplanetary
conflict had started with invading Martians spreading wide death and
destruction in New Jersey and New York”; how it affected the public: “The
broadcast, which disrupted households, interrupted religious services, created
traffic jams and clogged communications systems…”; and how people responded:
“In Newark, in a single block at Heddon Terrace and Hawthorne Avenue, more than
twenty families rushed out of their houses with wet handkerchiefs and towels
over their faces to flee from what they believed was to be a gas raid. Some
began moving household furniture. Throughout New York families left their
homes, some to flee to near-by parks. Thousands of persons called the police,
newspapers…”
2013
marked the 75th anniversary of the Oct. 30, 1938, broadcast. Today’s
coverage of the event definitely takes a much lighter look as compared to the
immediate coverage in 1938. The historic details are much the same: the program
began at about 8 p.m., there were only a couple of announcements detailing the
broadcast’s fictitious nature, mass hysteria ensued, etc., but the tone of the
stories detailing the drama today, compared to news coverage in 1938, has
shifted dramatically. The Los Angeles Times referred to the incident as “Welles'
night of mischief” in its coverage of the 75th anniversary. It is also worth mentioning that the
topic has been demoted from a front-page article to one found under
entertainment.
On
the other coast, The New York Daily News featured a slideshow
commemorating the anniversary of the transmission. The slideshow goes through
the phases of the broadcast, from Welles directing, producing and narrating “The
War of the Worlds,” to the news coverage it received, to the people of New
Jersey taking action against the supposed invading aliens.
A
lead showing today’s audience what radio listeners heard on the night of Oct.
30, 1938, would work to set the mood as it did over 75 years ago. The Los
Angeles Times does this in its coverage of the 75th anniversary of
the broadcast:
“Ladies and gentlemen, we interrupt our program of dance music to
bring you a special bulletin from the Intercontinental Radio News. At twenty
minutes before eight, central time, Professor Farrell of the Mount Jennings
Observatory, Chicago, Ill., reports observing several explosions of
incandescent gas, occurring at regular interviews on the planet Mars.” — Orson
Welles’ “War of the Worlds.”
Commemorative
coverage should also, in my opinion, include a detailed account of the
immediate reporting of the drama Welles’ drama created. It could include
front-page coverage featured in the New York Times and other newspapers in 1938.
An infographic detailing how many newspapers included the broadcast in their
issues would be data that would work to give people an idea of what an impact
the show made. This could then lead in to the less reported side of the story: the
public’s push to have the FCC take action. It would be very informative to show
the readers of today the backlash the event caused and how it affected not only
the radio-listening public but Welles, the FCC and the radio industry.
The New York Times/ Oct. 31,
1938/ 1, 4
The New York Times/ Nov. 1, 1938/
1, 26
The Washington Post/ Oct. 31,
1938/ 1,12
The Washington Post/ Nov. 1, 1938/
1,4
Los Angeles Times/ Oct. 31, 1938/
1,2
Los Angeles Times/ Nov. 1, 1938/
1, 2
Minerva Hernandez-Garcia is a senior majoring in mass communication at Texas State University. You can reach her at mah7@txstate.edu or @MinervaAHG
Minerva Hernandez-Garcia is a senior majoring in mass communication at Texas State University. You can reach her at mah7@txstate.edu or @MinervaAHG
No comments:
Post a Comment